My puppy uses a lot of RAM (Solved)

What works, and doesn't, for you. Be specific, and please include Puppy version.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
pp4mnklinux
Posts: 375
Joined: Fri 23 Aug 2013, 06:56

My puppy uses a lot of RAM (Solved)

#1 Post by pp4mnklinux »

Hello everybody:

You know that I asked a lot of times how to reduce my puppy uses, because although I had 4Gb of RAM, my pc get block at 3.79Gb.

I tried a lot of thigs, but (as always) the better the easier.

I put 8Gb more of RAM (NOW 12GB) and my problem had dissapear.

€40 and NO PROBLEM

(OPEN BOX + SLIMJET BROWSER with 40 video tabs)
Attachments
Quemando RAM.jpg
(10.17 KiB) Downloaded 551 times
Kingston KVR1333D3N9 4G.jpg
(43.82 KiB) Downloaded 522 times
Distro: xenialpup64 7.5 XXL
Desktop Panel: JWM ~ FbBox 5.0

User avatar
mikeslr
Posts: 3890
Joined: Mon 16 Jun 2008, 21:20
Location: 500 seconds from Sol

#2 Post by mikeslr »

:D

Money is always tight. But if you value your free time as much as what you make on an hourly basis, buying more RAM is also the most cost effective way to solve low RAM problems.

musher0
Posts: 14629
Joined: Mon 05 Jan 2009, 00:54
Location: Gatineau (Qc), Canada

#3 Post by musher0 »

I'm glad you found a solution, but it's still extremely weird that you would need 12 G of
RAM to run a Puppy.
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)

backi
Posts: 1922
Joined: Sun 27 Feb 2011, 22:00
Location: GERMANY

#4 Post by backi »

12 G of RAM to run a Puppy ???? .....tell me this ain`t true ....never heard this before...indeed fucking weird .

User avatar
Galbi
Posts: 1098
Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011, 22:32
Location: Bs.As. - Argentina.

#5 Post by Galbi »

backi wrote:12 G of RAM to run a Puppy ???? .....tell me this ain`t true ....never heard this before...indeed fucking weird .
:?
Yes, very strange... but he says: 'BROWSER with 40 video tabs'
Remember: [b][i]"pecunia pecuniam parere non potest"[/i][/b]

backi
Posts: 1922
Joined: Sun 27 Feb 2011, 22:00
Location: GERMANY

#6 Post by backi »

BROWSER with 40 video tabs
Overlooked it.......does it really take that much ram?

User avatar
pp4mnklinux
Posts: 375
Joined: Fri 23 Aug 2013, 06:56

hard info

#7 Post by pp4mnklinux »

backi wrote:
BROWSER with 40 video tabs
Overlooked it.......does it really take that much ram?
EXTREME USE .- image6

NORMAL USE.- image5 image4


Believe or not, that is and this is what I told


HAVE A NICE DAY (I never lie)
Attachments
image-6.jpg
(10.17 KiB) Downloaded 414 times
image-5.jpg
(63.14 KiB) Downloaded 429 times
image-4.jpg
(60.93 KiB) Downloaded 438 times
Distro: xenialpup64 7.5 XXL
Desktop Panel: JWM ~ FbBox 5.0

musher0
Posts: 14629
Joined: Mon 05 Jan 2009, 00:54
Location: Gatineau (Qc), Canada

#8 Post by musher0 »

I never said : you lied.
I said : that is weird for a PuppyLinux.

Run htop : it could probably provide a clue about this weirdness, it has a RAM column.
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)

User avatar
Mike Walsh
Posts: 6351
Joined: Sat 28 Jun 2014, 12:42
Location: King's Lynn, UK.

#9 Post by Mike Walsh »

I can well believe the 'weirdness'.

My old Compaq tower has 3 GB of RAM. Your average Chromium 'clone', with several non-video tabs open, will chew its way through that like there's no tomorrow.

Although I've been a fan of them for years, it's why I now prefer Palemoon for general browsing. Much lighter, and consumes far less in the way of resources.

[Mind you, if QtWeb was still under development, I know what I'd be using...]

----------------

@ musher0:-

That 12 GB ain't for his Puppy. It's to run the browser.....though why anybody in their right mind would want that many video tabs open at the same time is beyond me. :roll: :shock:


Mike. :wink:

User avatar
pp4mnklinux
Posts: 375
Joined: Fri 23 Aug 2013, 06:56

My comment was not directed to yours.

#10 Post by pp4mnklinux »

musher0 wrote:I never said : you lied.
I said : that is weird for a PuppyLinux.

Run htop : it could probably provide a clue about this weirdness, it has a RAM column.
Plz, don't consider my comment related with yours... It's my way to express.


Have a nice day u all.
Distro: xenialpup64 7.5 XXL
Desktop Panel: JWM ~ FbBox 5.0

User avatar
Lobster
Official Crustacean
Posts: 15522
Joined: Wed 04 May 2005, 06:06
Location: Paradox Realm
Contact:

#11 Post by Lobster »

Ye mad/bad coded browsers swamp the memory. Iz a cache thing.

Image

Ram in the Ram
It is Puppy dog sheep
Puppy Raspup 8.2Final 8)
Puppy Links Page http://www.smokey01.com/bruceb/puppy.html :D

User avatar
Galbi
Posts: 1098
Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011, 22:32
Location: Bs.As. - Argentina.

#12 Post by Galbi »


Remember: [b][i]"pecunia pecuniam parere non potest"[/i][/b]

musher0
Posts: 14629
Joined: Mon 05 Jan 2009, 00:54
Location: Gatineau (Qc), Canada

#13 Post by musher0 »

@galbi
What's a memory "slab"? One finds slabs in cemeteries...
"Here lies 1 Gb of RAM from musher0's PC... R.I.P." :twisted:

It's from a dev at Facebook, so anyone's private informations
will be compromised right from the start!!!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
@pp4mnklinux:
Have you diagnosed your RAM with htop yet?
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)

User avatar
Galbi
Posts: 1098
Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011, 22:32
Location: Bs.As. - Argentina.

#14 Post by Galbi »

I don't know either, it's too much technical for me, but I think that if this new controller is going to finally reach the kernel, it will have to pass through the master chief (Linus T.) and the whole kernel team.

Let's see what happens.

Bye
Remember: [b][i]"pecunia pecuniam parere non potest"[/i][/b]

musher0
Posts: 14629
Joined: Mon 05 Jan 2009, 00:54
Location: Gatineau (Qc), Canada

#15 Post by musher0 »

Thanks for the additional comment, Galbi.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

@pp4mnklinux:
A late thought -- I should have thought of suggesting this to you at the very beginning...

Did you run a RAM test on your original RAM?
There is one available from the BIOS
and
some distros offer it at boot
and
there are utilities such as memtester and memtest86 that can do this.
(Enter "memtester" in the Duck's search line and you'll find them.)

Those utilities take a good while to complete, but they diagnose if part of your RAM is
broken and where (the RAM addresses).

Maybe could have saved you a few dollars. I say this because if a RAM stick is bad,
the system skips it and goes to the next good one (I'm not absolutely sure, but I think
that is how it works on recent computers.)

IHTH.
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
"You want it darker? We kill the flame." (L. Cohen)

Illutorium
Posts: 170
Joined: Wed 06 Aug 2014, 07:12

#16 Post by Illutorium »

Old version as FatDog64-721 are be a Last good who doesn't lags while of RAMdisk.
When I knowed only on FatDog anyway... - Newest versions does lags of 1,11GB use per 1,89GB (x5-Z8350|HDMI Stick) so: Old versions > New versions
Now I have a Optiplex 3020 SFF (Last good Model of a Low Price) and I do be Frugal Install to FatDog64 on USB 3.1 stick (32GB)...

Post Reply