1. Paying all my respects to BarryK, a man so generous he gives us the answer: 'make your own Puppy with unleashed'.
2. Not trying to say what Puppy must be.
3. Not willing to listen search in other place.
4. Just as a mental exsercise and at best as a idea for devolper(s).
---
**It's Puppy as small as it should?**
Doubtless for Puppy small is better:
Faster download, faster load, faster run.
Less RAM, less money, more old PC
That is what I have learned in Puppy's Web.
And although other people has pointed it before nobody have answered that plain.
If small is better why there is so much redundancy in Puppy?
'Because I like this flavor for this and that flavor for that' it is a very poor reason when weight (Mb) is so important.
To much pay for flavors. More enought if you can PupGet you flavor.
Even Barebone Puppy seems to have superfluous programs...
It is clear there must to be a balance between weight and power but, It is Puppy on its best solution?
For example:
It's fwvm98 better that JWM?
I use JWM and I don't find any bug.
How much weigth deserves a flavor?
Think in a light airplane that wants to fly to a far island. You need less weight to reach the airport. What really you need to fly in confort and sure and what is just a bad habit from heavy ariplanes?
So, (please don't answer 'make you own Puppy', try to think a little more):
It's all this redundancy needed? Does Puppy really use the smaller yet powerfull aplications available?
Thx
Sirexel
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)