1.0.6 final bugs
1.0.6 final bugs
these wrappers use $@ to pass parameters, so if there are spaces in the PATH to the file(s) passed as parameters, it won't work
defaultcalendar
defaultcontact
defaultemail
defaulthtmleditor
defaulttexteditor
defaultwordprocessor
for example, if you click readme.txt in /mnt/home/My Documents, nothing will happen
of course, changing $@ to "$@" fixes the problem
defaultcalendar
defaultcontact
defaultemail
defaulthtmleditor
defaulttexteditor
defaultwordprocessor
for example, if you click readme.txt in /mnt/home/My Documents, nothing will happen
of course, changing $@ to "$@" fixes the problem
- BarryK
- Puppy Master
- Posts: 9392
- Joined: Mon 09 May 2005, 09:23
- Location: Perth, Western Australia
- Contact:
Thanks, will fix.
...no, I just checked.
they already have quotes around the $@.
This must be an upgrade problem, the new ones not overwriting the old ones.
...no, I just checked.
they already have quotes around the $@.
This must be an upgrade problem, the new ones not overwriting the old ones.
Last edited by BarryK on Tue 08 Nov 2005, 23:51, edited 1 time in total.
- BarryK
- Puppy Master
- Posts: 9392
- Joined: Mon 09 May 2005, 09:23
- Location: Perth, Western Australia
- Contact:
I take that back. I put quotes in the original files, but not in all cases in thethey already have quotes around the $@.
post-install scripts, pinstall.sh, in each unleashed package.
Okay, I'll go through the packages now, find the culprits, also burniso2cd.
...so, looks like a candidate for the service pack.
Note, some of them, like defaultpaint, should have the quotes, do for me anyway, as they were not overridden by any pinstall.sh script.
Pmount shows completely wrong values on my system.
The old one worked ok.
It does not display all drives, and it says every drive is 1984 M in size.
I just wanted to submit a screenshot with MUT (works mostly correct) for comparison, but MUT does not start with the KDE-usr_more.sfs
I will add one later.
Mark
The old one worked ok.
It does not display all drives, and it says every drive is 1984 M in size.
I just wanted to submit a screenshot with MUT (works mostly correct) for comparison, but MUT does not start with the KDE-usr_more.sfs
I will add one later.
Mark
http://noforum.de/pics/pmountbug.jpg
Please tell me what you need for additional info.
MUT does not display hda10, but that is since Pupy 104.
Maybe my corrupt partitiontable confuses it, but the old version worked ok.
This is what I get on the commandline:
# pmount
/usr/sbin/pmount: line 36: 11166 Terminated xmessage -bg "#ff00ff" -title "Puppy drive mounter" -center -buttons "" "Please wait for the usb-storage driver to load...
Note: A USB1 interface takes longer to initialise than a USB2 interface,
in the former case up to 25 seconds, in the latter about 4 seconds.
If a plugged-in USB drive does not show up in the next window, click
the REFRESH button to probe the hardware again."
Warning: ignoring extra data in partition table 9
Warning: extra link pointer in partition table 9
Mark
Please tell me what you need for additional info.
MUT does not display hda10, but that is since Pupy 104.
Maybe my corrupt partitiontable confuses it, but the old version worked ok.
This is what I get on the commandline:
# pmount
/usr/sbin/pmount: line 36: 11166 Terminated xmessage -bg "#ff00ff" -title "Puppy drive mounter" -center -buttons "" "Please wait for the usb-storage driver to load...
Note: A USB1 interface takes longer to initialise than a USB2 interface,
in the former case up to 25 seconds, in the latter about 4 seconds.
If a plugged-in USB drive does not show up in the next window, click
the REFRESH button to probe the hardware again."
Warning: ignoring extra data in partition table 9
Warning: extra link pointer in partition table 9
Mark
i put a fix for the default-wrappers-spaces bug in my SP106 package
i uploaded an (experimental) pmount bugfix dotpup-package here
if it seems to work ok, i could add it to SP106
it only fixes the incorrect size information bug ... it does not fix problems with non-standard/corrupt partition tables
i don't think pmount tries to show you every partition you might have on your drive
i uploaded an (experimental) pmount bugfix dotpup-package here
if it seems to work ok, i could add it to SP106
it only fixes the incorrect size information bug ... it does not fix problems with non-standard/corrupt partition tables
i don't think pmount tries to show you every partition you might have on your drive
yes, that fixes the size
Thank you, G2
> i don't think pmount tries to show you every partition you might have on your drive
Hm, but the old version in Puppy 105 did.
So is it intended not to display all, or is it a bug?
i would prefer to see all.
It is not that important, as there is MUT, but I thought I better let you know.
Mark
Thank you, G2
> i don't think pmount tries to show you every partition you might have on your drive
Hm, but the old version in Puppy 105 did.
So is it intended not to display all, or is it a bug?
i would prefer to see all.
It is not that important, as there is MUT, but I thought I better let you know.
Mark
HD Install / MUT bug
MUT
MUT will not recognize /dev/hdb10 (I notice above that it will not recognize /dev/hda10 either). Pmount does.
HD Install
Sadly, I chose to install Puppy to /dev/hdb10. The HD install script will not recognize /dev/hdb10 and fails. HOWEVER, if you use the "install-hd2.sh" script that was introduced as a bug-fix in 1.0.5 then everything is OK.
Rgds
GS
"vp&ftgs"
MUT
MUT will not recognize /dev/hdb10 (I notice above that it will not recognize /dev/hda10 either). Pmount does.
HD Install
Sadly, I chose to install Puppy to /dev/hdb10. The HD install script will not recognize /dev/hdb10 and fails. HOWEVER, if you use the "install-hd2.sh" script that was introduced as a bug-fix in 1.0.5 then everything is OK.
Rgds
GS
"vp&ftgs"
- BarryK
- Puppy Master
- Posts: 9392
- Joined: Mon 09 May 2005, 09:23
- Location: Perth, Western Australia
- Contact:
You mean, the install-hd2.sh in 1.0.6 is not work, but the bugfix one will?noip wrote:HD Install
Sadly, I chose to install Puppy to /dev/hdb10. The HD install script will not recognize /dev/hdb10 and fails. HOWEVER, if you use the "install-hd2.sh" script that was introduced as a bug-fix in 1.0.5 then everything is OK.
...hmmm, that's odd. Do you have the bugfix one handy and can post it,
I'll need to compare the two, see what I neglected to fix.
- klhrevolutionist
- Posts: 1121
- Joined: Wed 08 Jun 2005, 10:09
no go
I installed puppy to it's own partition with no problems.
Heaven is on the way, until then let's get the truth out!
Barry,
Here's the script I'd kept from 1.0.5. I tried the HD install script in 1.0.6 twice, and it failed both times when it couldn't recognize /dev/hdb10. However, trying the script that I'd downloaded for 1.0.5 to allow it to install worked like a charm first time.
Not sure why, since I thought the CD one would work ....
Rgds
GS
vp&ftgs
Here's the script I'd kept from 1.0.5. I tried the HD install script in 1.0.6 twice, and it failed both times when it couldn't recognize /dev/hdb10. However, trying the script that I'd downloaded for 1.0.5 to allow it to install worked like a charm first time.
Not sure why, since I thought the CD one would work ....
Rgds
GS
vp&ftgs
There is a dotpup with these libs, but it is quite huge
http://www.murga.org/%7Epuppy/viewtopic ... rpm4+2libs
Code: Select all
# pwd
/mnt/hda8/usr/local/dotpups/rpm4.2libs/FILESYSTEM/usr/lib
# ls -l
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Oct 1 09:10 libbz2.so.1.0 -> libbz2.so.1.0.0
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 65676 Oct 1 09:10 libelf-0.84.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Oct 1 09:10 libelf.so.1 -> libelf-0.84.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 309104 Oct 1 09:09 librpm-4.2.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 951080 Oct 1 09:09 librpmdb-4.2.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 361896 Oct 1 09:09 librpmio-4.2.so
Printing problem in 1.0.6 final
I was able to print from 1.0.6 RC with the builtin printing support easily without any problems. However, with the final release I got errors where gs was unable to find some libraries. I had to copy the following files to /usr/lib
/.usr_cram/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6
/.usr_cram/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6
/.usr_cram/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6
/.usr_cram/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6
/.usr_cram/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
Has anything changed related to printing since the rc?
/.usr_cram/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6
/.usr_cram/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6
/.usr_cram/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6
/.usr_cram/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6
/.usr_cram/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
Has anything changed related to printing since the rc?