![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
ttuuxxx
But it is only "really" designed for editing text box fields in web pages as I describe in the second post of this thread here http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=41580ttuuxxx wrote:Yes I've used xinha many times in the past couple of years and for the size of it, its outstanding sure it isn't kompozer but its 1/10 the size. If you have firefox or firepup handy just give it a shot.Lobster wrote:xinha looks better - maybe smaller and better than composer too . . .
look forward to hearing how you get on :D
http://xinha.raimundmeyer.de/x_examples ... ample.html
I think that is very true. Most users think that involves coding and don't realise how handy it is to simply write notes in html using a WYSIWYG editor and using such a fast loading local html page as the startup homepage for their browser. With the Codetch Firefox extension, you just need to right click on a displayed page and it becomes instantly editable in another tab of your browser. Or start with a blank page and its just like using a simple wordprocessor. Html isn't just useful for creating big websites... Indeed, I tend to use an old Palm Pilot (well an old Palm m125) as an alarm when I'm baking scones or cooking generally; I also carry a copy of my default browser home page around on that, because I keep all my tech notes on that, and can edit it in any text editor or view it as WYSIWYG using Plucker. Wiki syntax is overated; html is a universal standard and easily translated into other formats (such as Latex, rtf, Plucker, or stripped to bare text). Hence my poorly designed local html homepage template: http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=41466aragon wrote:"Most users use Kompozer or NVU". Sorry, i think that's not correct. I think, most users did not create homepages very often.