BarryK wrote:I have a problem with 'glxgears' in Racy, see my blog report:
http://bkhome.org/blog/?viewDetailed=02574
Tests of glxgears on other video hardware greatly appreciated!
Make sure all apps etc. closed before testing, in case it hangs. I had to hold down the power-off button on my laptop for 4 seconds.
Dug an old box with Intel graphics off the shelf.....no problem with glxgears.
# report-video
Racy Puppy, version 5.1.110 on Mon 31 Oct 2011
Chip description:
2.0 VGA compatible controller
Intel Corporation 82865G Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02)
oem: Intel(r)865G Graphics Chip Accelerated VGA BIOS
product: Intel(r)865G Graphics Controller Hardware Version 0.0
X Server: Xorg
Driver used: # vesa
X.Org version: 1.11.0
dimensions: 1024x768 pixels (270x203 millimeters)
depth of root window: 24 planes
...the above also recorded in /tmp/root/ as report-video,
and archived with xorg.conf and Xorg.0.log as report-video-full.gz
#
Interestingly though..../var/log/Xorg.0.log shows the Intel driver being used.
[ 62.064] ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 5.0
[ 62.064] (II) UnloadModule: "vesa"
[ 62.064] (II) Unloading vesa
62.064] (==) Depth 24 pixmap format is 32 bpp
[ 62.064] (II) intel(0): [DRI2] Setup complete
[ 62.064] (II) intel(0): [DRI2] DRI driver: i915
[ 62.064] (II) intel(0): Allocated new frame buffer 1024x768 stride 4096, tiled
[ 62.078] (II) UXA(0): Driver registered support for the following operations:
# glxgears
778 frames in 5.0 seconds = 155.511 FPS
809 frames in 5.0 seconds = 161.796 FPS
802 frames in 5.0 seconds = 160.350 FPS
813 frames in 5.0 seconds = 162.546 FPS
791 frames in 5.0 seconds = 158.162 FPS
812 frames in 5.0 seconds = 162.357 FPS
800 frames in 5.0 seconds = 159.890 FPS
808 frames in 5.0 seconds = 161.475 FPS