can not find info on level 4 with iso9660jamesbond wrote:Ted Dog, does it still work if you change iso-level to 4 instead of 3?
is level 4 ISO13490/ECMA-168?
No, when you use the iso-level setting of "4", mkisofs actually use iso9660:1999 specification. This is the "supposedly" proper way to use -D (ref: http://linux.die.net/man/8/mkisofs). I can confirm that if you use this setting, the disc is readable fine under Windows XP. The question is whether it can still burn > 4GB files and whether there are any specific bluray stuff that fails.Ted Dog wrote:can not find info on level 4 with iso9660jamesbond wrote:Ted Dog, does it still work if you change iso-level to 4 instead of 3?
is level 4 ISO13490/ECMA-168?
Code: Select all
! $GROWISOFS -root $archivepath "$SAVEFILE_MOUNT"/archive/* > /dev/null && save_ok=no
seeFlash wrote:Ted, is there any chance that Fatdog64-611-SeaMonkey will work instead of Fatdog64-620? I already have the iso and I prefer SeaMonkey to Firefox.
I can also confirm that "-D -iso-level 4" is a replacement for "-J" in XP and Win7. This is both when writing directly to a data DVD and making an ISO to burn data onto a CD.jamesbond wrote:No, when you use the iso-level setting of "4", mkisofs actually use iso9660:1999 specification. This is the "supposedly" proper way to use -D (ref: http://linux.die.net/man/8/mkisofs). I can confirm that if you use this setting, the disc is readable fine under Windows XP.
Yes to all.zigbert wrote:I don't get all your talk, so let me ask...
As I understand it. setting isolevel to 4 (and removing -J) would improve the pBurn execution to be compatible with recent windows.
1.) Will it be compatible with windows 7/8 as well as XP?
2.) Are there any reasons for using isolevel 3?
3.) Does this allow burning files over 4Gb?
4.) If so, could this replace UDF?
Thank you
Sigmund
Oh I got those too, but progress on the testing of iso-level was well matched up with BD-RE and some BD-R needed to be used to finish up my 134 test cases... I did not try them all, 7 test cases are the most likely to fail. Also needed to backup a 400G HD and was running short. BD-RE takes about 30 mins longer than BD-R so for 'nearly full' disc tests, a few BD-R's are used. I get mine in bulk at 70cents each. (a G of storage for 3cents)Flash wrote:Ted, why don't you get one or two BD-RE disks for experimenting with? I got some Kodak ones from Fry's for about $4 each. They work fine with the burning applications in Puppy. They even have some kind of "hard coat" supposed to make them more scratch resistant.