[CLOSED]JWM Desktop Updates to V755(Release) and V910(Test)
@jasper, hi
Is it only those two apps or do all apps start to the right?
Also, if you shrink them a little bit more, do they still move right?
before I put a problem to joe, I had best get some further info as I cannot duplicate your problem on any of my boxes, although i don't have precise 5.6 loaded anywhere, downloading one now. By the way there is a 5.6.1 bugfix out.
Is it only those two apps or do all apps start to the right?
Also, if you shrink them a little bit more, do they still move right?
before I put a problem to joe, I had best get some further info as I cannot duplicate your problem on any of my boxes, although i don't have precise 5.6 loaded anywhere, downloading one now. By the way there is a 5.6.1 bugfix out.
Hi again,
I reduced abiword to 900 x 675 and dillo to 800 x 600 and
checked the pre and post v 768 positions with a pixel ruler
and saw no movement, Since you have almost certainly hit the
nail on head and as they are the only apps I want to and can
open in a specific position I did not try to test more apps.
I did post in BarryK's Precise 5.6/5.6.1 at the very bottom
of page 5 about the superb speed increase in JWM menus
thanks to technosaurus - I expect Joe and yourself already
know about that.
I will not be suggesting to BarryK that there may be a
minor bug in Precise 5.6/5.6.1 (though I do hope npierce
will update Barry on his abiword non-US spell-checker
problem fixes).
To be honest I have never used the layer optioms in earnest
and I gather JWM v768 Test has some speed increases and
a nice right click shade option. I only use JWM and ROX so
I'm very pleased Joe is making improvements and although
I was and am happy to try to test v768 I have no idea of
any other changes.
My regards
I reduced abiword to 900 x 675 and dillo to 800 x 600 and
checked the pre and post v 768 positions with a pixel ruler
and saw no movement, Since you have almost certainly hit the
nail on head and as they are the only apps I want to and can
open in a specific position I did not try to test more apps.
I did post in BarryK's Precise 5.6/5.6.1 at the very bottom
of page 5 about the superb speed increase in JWM menus
thanks to technosaurus - I expect Joe and yourself already
know about that.
I will not be suggesting to BarryK that there may be a
minor bug in Precise 5.6/5.6.1 (though I do hope npierce
will update Barry on his abiword non-US spell-checker
problem fixes).
To be honest I have never used the layer optioms in earnest
and I gather JWM v768 Test has some speed increases and
a nice right click shade option. I only use JWM and ROX so
I'm very pleased Joe is making improvements and although
I was and am happy to try to test v768 I have no idea of
any other changes.
My regards
I fear that my request for easier window minimization (issue #45) may make it easier to break nested windows. Ideally, when all of the windows in a stack have individual minimize buttons, you'd expect to be able to minimize all of them using the taskbar entry as well. But when you're dealing with windows that cannot be closed until the child window is closed... things are easier to break.
This can be duplicated in QtWeb. Options -> Advanced -> Search Providers -> Add New. Minimize and restore the main window several times, and one of the nested windows will break. Granted, you had the ability to minimize multiple nested windows before issue #45 was resolved, you just couldn't do it from the taskbar. But I can't duplicate this in v574.
This can be duplicated in QtWeb. Options -> Advanced -> Search Providers -> Add New. Minimize and restore the main window several times, and one of the nested windows will break. Granted, you had the ability to minimize multiple nested windows before issue #45 was resolved, you just couldn't do it from the taskbar. But I can't duplicate this in v574.
- Attachments
-
- jwm_capture185.jpg
- That's a lot of nested windows
- (56.76 KiB) Downloaded 599 times
[color=green]Primary[/color] - Intel Pentium 4 2.40GHz, 571MB RAM, ATI Radeon 7000. Linux Mint 17 Qiana installed.
[color=blue]Secondary[/color] - Pentium 3 533MHz, 385MB RAM, ATI Rage 128 Pro ULTRA TF. Precise Puppy 5.7.1 Retro full install.
[color=blue]Secondary[/color] - Pentium 3 533MHz, 385MB RAM, ATI Rage 128 Pro ULTRA TF. Precise Puppy 5.7.1 Retro full install.
v722 test build
@jasper, I think your problem has been fixed by joe with the latest snapshot.
@session, Yours may also be ok now, joe has done some fixes that may have sorted it all out.
I shall build, test and make available a V772 test build tomorrow, I have to go out tonight to a CFA meeting.
@session, Yours may also be ok now, joe has done some fixes that may have sorted it all out.
I shall build, test and make available a V772 test build tomorrow, I have to go out tonight to a CFA meeting.
ChangeLog<---(from current all the way back to 2005!) says
If you like that feature, it can be swapped back in with the src/cursor.c from 762 .. doesn't seem to break anything in 772 as far as I can tell. Of course whether the custom hover cursors look 'right' depends on your cursor set
as of Fri May 31 18:42:46 2013No more custom cursors for close/minimize/maximize.
If you like that feature, it can be swapped back in with the src/cursor.c from 762 .. doesn't seem to break anything in 772 as far as I can tell. Of course whether the custom hover cursors look 'right' depends on your cursor set
v775
I have uploaded a test version 775, have fun!
...meanwhile, my problem is fixed.
Resizing while maximized is now disabled... I've used that quite often to set window size, but it became redundant after recent versions made it so easy to maximize X or Y; this is certainly more streamlined.
@jasper: window placement is a little different after v768 in some apps... you can always use the --geometry option, say 936x702+0+0 (curiously, dillo won't respect 0+0, you have to do 0+1 to get as close to the corner as possible)
Resizing while maximized is now disabled... I've used that quite often to set window size, but it became redundant after recent versions made it so easy to maximize X or Y; this is certainly more streamlined.
@jasper: window placement is a little different after v768 in some apps... you can always use the --geometry option, say 936x702+0+0 (curiously, dillo won't respect 0+0, you have to do 0+1 to get as close to the corner as possible)
Last edited by session on Thu 13 Jun 2013, 03:52, edited 1 time in total.
[color=green]Primary[/color] - Intel Pentium 4 2.40GHz, 571MB RAM, ATI Radeon 7000. Linux Mint 17 Qiana installed.
[color=blue]Secondary[/color] - Pentium 3 533MHz, 385MB RAM, ATI Rage 128 Pro ULTRA TF. Precise Puppy 5.7.1 Retro full install.
[color=blue]Secondary[/color] - Pentium 3 533MHz, 385MB RAM, ATI Rage 128 Pro ULTRA TF. Precise Puppy 5.7.1 Retro full install.
@jasper, I have added a problem to joe's issue list for you.
EDIT 14june: I have just downloaded v777, I shall build and test tonight before uploading tomorrow as i'm working today elsewhere.
EDIT 14june: I have just downloaded v777, I shall build and test tonight before uploading tomorrow as i'm working today elsewhere.
Last edited by scsijon on Thu 13 Jun 2013, 21:54, edited 1 time in total.
@jasper
Joe answered with:-
Can you try to work it out with sessions help?
I have put the problem on joe's system on hold until needed.
regards
Joe answered with:-
I must admit that I haden't seen this mentioned in the changelog, else I would have mentioned it.The window placement has changed somewhat, so I would expect that some windows might open in different locations. Are the applications being started with a "-geometry" option?
Can you try to work it out with sessions help?
I have put the problem on joe's system on hold until needed.
regards
@jasper: It seems that the change has happend to fix the problems relating to windows dissapearing off screen.
Details from joe are:
---------------------------------
@all: I have uploaded a test build of v777 for your testing.
If all is ok after some user testing, I intend using this for the next release version in about seven days so can I have responses in the thread with the puppy's you have used or tested it against listed please.
I shall also build a x86_64 as previously promised now I have found which box the Fatdog x86 partition is on!
regards
EDIT: 785 will NOT be uploaded tonight. Barryk had found a problem relating to geany which joe had fixed, however it's broken again.
Details from joe are:
So it looks like we are stuck with them as it's fixing other problems.The relevant commits that would have changed the behavior are 3ee8ddc and 4dd7c84. The problem these commits solve relates to the placement of windows that would go off the screen if placed where JWM would normally place a window.
Commit 3ee8ddc makes it so JWM correctly accounts for the window border size.
Commit 4dd7c84 makes it so JWM doesn't revert to the upper left-most position on the screen if the placement algorithm fails (instead, only the direction of the overflow is reset). In addition, 4dd7c84 constrains newly mapped windows to the area of the screen that JWM is willing to use even if a program specifies its own position.
---------------------------------
@all: I have uploaded a test build of v777 for your testing.
If all is ok after some user testing, I intend using this for the next release version in about seven days so can I have responses in the thread with the puppy's you have used or tested it against listed please.
I shall also build a x86_64 as previously promised now I have found which box the Fatdog x86 partition is on!
regards
EDIT: 785 will NOT be uploaded tonight. Barryk had found a problem relating to geany which joe had fixed, however it's broken again.
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Tue 16 Feb 2010, 00:22
Hi scsijon,
My Wine/Windows clock has acquired a green border using v 805 Test.
This is new since V 777 Test.
My regards
PS Just to confirm - I have the same problem that session describes in his post below.
My Wine/Windows clock has acquired a green border using v 805 Test.
This is new since V 777 Test.
My regards
PS Just to confirm - I have the same problem that session describes in his post below.
- Attachments
-
- image-1.png
- (33.73 KiB) Downloaded 638 times
Last edited by Jasper on Sat 22 Jun 2013, 21:44, edited 1 time in total.
Taskbar functionality is broken in v805, that is to say, the last minimized window will "stick" in the taskbar. This in turn disables keybindings.
[color=green]Primary[/color] - Intel Pentium 4 2.40GHz, 571MB RAM, ATI Radeon 7000. Linux Mint 17 Qiana installed.
[color=blue]Secondary[/color] - Pentium 3 533MHz, 385MB RAM, ATI Rage 128 Pro ULTRA TF. Precise Puppy 5.7.1 Retro full install.
[color=blue]Secondary[/color] - Pentium 3 533MHz, 385MB RAM, ATI Rage 128 Pro ULTRA TF. Precise Puppy 5.7.1 Retro full install.