I tried the StandAlone-RunScript-RoxApp-Dir.tar.gz
Very impressive
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
I apologize, maybe I explained it in a bad waypartsman wrote:This kinda makes it sound like you have installed lazy puppy !inoxidabile wrote:Hi everybody!
Sorry, just a little question... Trying Lazy as live from usb.
Clicking on the top bar for internet it says that there isn't sfs for firefox.
Then it asks for download it, after accept this the download starts (from smokey01) and then it seems ok.
But after good download a message appears, saying that it isn't ok.
Then, with Puppy package manager I select firefox and in this way everything runs fine.
please read this and follow the instructions here![]()
http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic. ... 139#736139
Or maybe i miss understand you ?
You do mean the message about different md5sum found.inoxidabile wrote:Hi everybody!
Sorry, just a little question... Trying Lazy as live from usb.
Clicking on the top bar for internet it says that there isn't sfs for firefox.
Then it asks for download it, after accept this the download starts (from smokey01) and then it seems ok.
But after good download a message appears, saying that it isn't ok.
Then, with Puppy package manager I select firefox and in this way everything runs fine.
mikeb wrote:Ok downloaded it, tried it but no sfs obtained perhaps the lack of DISTRO_FILE_PREFIX would be the reason.... something easily hacked or is there more to it?
Ok, so it doesn't work for mikeb, but it does for partsman.partsman wrote:@RSH
I tried the StandAlone-RunScript-RoxApp-Dir.tar.gz
Very impressive
RSHs-ScriptBox was just an addition to give anyone an easy start for testings. Actually it is a rough cut-down of the version that I'm using here - and turned it into EN for this (mine is DE only).So just to clarify the use of sfs files and RSH script box are not the modular idea here "just a little extra bonus" am i right ?
Added this option several years ago and yes its works nicely. Was pretty simple and mainly involved the use of a bind mount.For those with frugal installs on a linux partition, using a "save directory" in place of a "save file" would be a very neat way to go.
Ok, I see.mikeb wrote:No bootconfig or distrospecs or my-roxapps.... so cannot really join in with the testing here....guess my puppies are not so puppy after all ....
Worry not
mike
Code: Select all
PUPMODE=6
PDEV1='hda3'
DEV1FS='ext2'
PUPSFS='pup_415.sfs'
PUPSAVE='ext2,hda3,/415_archive.sfs'
#these directories are unionfs layers in /initrd...
SAVE_LAYER=''
PUP_LAYER='/pup_ro2'
Code: Select all
DISTRO_NAME='Lucid Puppy'
DISTRO_VERSION=525
DISTRO_MINOR_VERSION=00
DISTRO_BINARY_COMPAT='ubuntu'
DISTRO_FILE_PREFIX='lupu'
DISTRO_COMPAT_VERSION='lucid'
DISTRO_KERNEL_PET='linux_kernel-2.6.33.2-tickless_smp_patched-L3.pet'
DISTRO_IDSTRING='l525130426141631'
DISTRO_PUPPYSFS='pup_525.sfs'
Code: Select all
PUPMODE=6
PDEV1='sda3'
DEV1FS='ext2'
PUPSFS='pup_525.sfs'
PUPSAVE='ext2,sda3,/525_archive.sfs'
#these directories are unionfs layers in /initrd...
SAVE_LAYER=''
PUP_LAYER='/pup_ro2'
It gave an error message at first but then did download the program.... it then downloaded java. It mounted sda3 and created a modules folder and added the first sfs to it and mounted it to pup_ro4. The java sfs never did and I could not find it.
The use of 525_archive.sfs defined as the PUPSAVE of course was the reason for this. When a save file is in use, sfs_load tries to move/copy the SFS Modules. So, the java might have been copied to a black hole etc.pp.PUPSAVE='ext2,sda3,/525_archive.sfs'
Code: Select all
DISTRO_NAME='LazY Puppy'
DISTRO_VERSION='300'
DISTRO_MINOR_VERSION=00
DISTRO_BINARY_COMPAT='ubuntu'
DISTRO_FILE_PREFIX='RSHsLP3'
DISTRO_COMPAT_VERSION='lucid'
DISTRO_KERNEL_PET='linux_kernel-2.6.33.2-tickless_smp_patched-L3.pet'
DISTRO_IDSTRING='R300131123060322'
DISTRO_PUPPYSFS='RSHsLP3_300.sfs'
DISTRO_ZDRVSFS='RSHsLP3_Extension.sfs'
Code: Select all
DISTRO_NAME='RSHsLP3 Puppy'
DISTRO_FILE_PREFIX='RSHsLP3'
DISTRO_VERSION='300'
DISTRO_PUPPYSFS='RSHsLP3_300.sfs'
DISTRO_ZDRVSFS='zR30026332.sfs'
DISTRO_KERNEL_PET='linux_kernel-2.6.33.2.pet'
DISTRO_IDSTRING='R300131125211432'
Hm, don't know, what you mean.I noticed you did not load sfs to ram ...is that intentional or just for testing?
Code: Select all
DISPLAYRUNOVERRIDE="Module"
DISPLAYRUNOVERRIDELPBPLOPT="true"