LibreOffice + language packs (latest version: 6.1.4)
- Puppus Dogfellow
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Tue 08 Jan 2013, 01:39
- Location: nyc
LibreOffice-5.0.2_en-US_xz.pet, LibreOffice-5.0.2_en-US_xz.sfs
seems to open significantly faster than the four series or even 5.0.1.
seems to open significantly faster than the four series or even 5.0.1.
Last edited by Puppus Dogfellow on Tue 29 Sep 2015, 20:21, edited 1 time in total.
Hi Puppus DogfellowPuppus Dogfellow wrote:LibreOffice-5.0.2_en-US_xz.pet, LibreOffice-5.0.2_en-US_xz.sfs
seems to open significantly faster than the four series or even 5.0.1.
Same link - both lead to .pet - no .sfs ...............
.pet is VERY big.....
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
- Puppus Dogfellow
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Tue 08 Jan 2013, 01:39
- Location: nyc
fixed the link, thanks. pet is 223, sfs is 184. you can further compress the sfs if you like--should get it down to under 160. large pet is the fastest libre yet so i see no point in fiddling with it, but i'd host the smaller version if you'd care to make it.peebee wrote:Hi Puppus DogfellowPuppus Dogfellow wrote:LibreOffice-5.0.2_en-US_xz.pet, LibreOffice-5.0.2_en-US_xz.sfs
seems to open significantly faster than the four series or even 5.0.1.
Same link - both lead to .pet - no .sfs ...............
.pet is VERY big.....
Thank you, Puppus. They're in the first page now.Puppus Dogfellow wrote:LibreOffice-5.0.2_en-US_xz.pet, LibreOffice-5.0.2_en-US_xz.sfs
seems to open significantly faster than the four series or even 5.0.1.
peebee wrote:.pet is VERY big.....
Radky's pArchive can create xz-compressed pets:Puppus Dogfellow wrote:large pet is the fastest libre yet so i see no point in fiddling with it, but i'd host the smaller version if you'd care to make it.
http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=96021
The size of my latest SFS is 157 MB including Spanish langpack but removing the scalable folder of gnome and hicolor icons, packaging without extra languages should make it a bit smaller than that.Radky wrote:Note:
In pArchive, creating pet packages with xz-compression requires a recent Puppy dir2pet script with xz support (ex: Slacko Puppy 5.7/6.0).
Installing an xz-compressed pet requires a recent Puppy installpkg.sh script with xz support (ex: Slacko Puppy 5.7/6.0 & tahrpup 6.0 CE).
[url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=76948]Puppy Linux en español[/url]
I downloaded libreoffice502.deb from here https://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-fresh/
how to install files .deb?
how to convert into sfs?
i want to learn how to make that.
thank you.
how to install files .deb?
how to convert into sfs?
i want to learn how to make that.
thank you.
- Puppus Dogfellow
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Tue 08 Jan 2013, 01:39
- Location: nyc
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=65918recobayu wrote:I downloaded libreoffice502.deb from here https://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-fresh/
how to install files .deb?
how to convert into sfs?
i want to learn how to make that.
thank you.
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=81316
recobayu, i used 30.1 from the first link to make the sfs and the sfs to pet pet by The Asterisk! in the second to convert it. 01micko made the sfs-making utility and rerwin and a few others have taken it upon themselves to update it.
hth.
- Puppus Dogfellow
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Tue 08 Jan 2013, 01:39
- Location: nyc
5.0.2 for 64 bit pups
LibreOffice-5.0.2_64_en-US_xz.pet
LibreOffice-5.0.2_64_en-US_xz.sfs
dependencies:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id= ... sp=sharing
libdbus-1-3_1.2.16_amd64.pet
libdbus-glib-1-2_0.84_amd64.pet
http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic. ... 860#846860
(deps thanks to xanad)
----------
a note of potential interest:
i just moved from precise 5.7.2 to quirky 7.2 on this machine. once the latter was up and running and LibreOffice installed, i moved my user folder over from /root/.config/libreoffice/4/ in the old installation to the new one, and even the document recovery feature picked up on the rather scattered list i left for it. (i broke the other distro messing around with terminals and libraries and other things i probably shouldn't have touched. ).
anyway, you can keep your customizations in the move from 32 to 64 bit.
LibreOffice-5.0.2_64_en-US_xz.sfs
dependencies:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id= ... sp=sharing
libdbus-1-3_1.2.16_amd64.pet
libdbus-glib-1-2_0.84_amd64.pet
http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic. ... 860#846860
(deps thanks to xanad)
----------
a note of potential interest:
i just moved from precise 5.7.2 to quirky 7.2 on this machine. once the latter was up and running and LibreOffice installed, i moved my user folder over from /root/.config/libreoffice/4/ in the old installation to the new one, and even the document recovery feature picked up on the rather scattered list i left for it. (i broke the other distro messing around with terminals and libraries and other things i probably shouldn't have touched. ).
anyway, you can keep your customizations in the move from 32 to 64 bit.
Re: 5.0.2 for 64 bit pups
Briefly tested calc, writer and impress from sfs on Fatdog64-701 and they worked well. Thanks.Puppus Dogfellow wrote: LibreOffice-5.0.2_64_en-US_xz.sfs
[url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=117546]Fatdog64-810[/url]|[url=http://goo.gl/hqZtiB]+Packages[/url]|[url=http://goo.gl/6dbEzT]Kodi[/url]|[url=http://goo.gl/JQC4Vz]gtkmenuplus[/url]
Re: 5.0.2 for 64 bit pups
Puppus Dogfellow wrote:LibreOffice-5.0.2_64_en-US_xz.pet
LibreOffice-5.0.2_64_en-US_xz.sfs
dependencies:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id= ... sp=sharing
libdbus-1-3_1.2.16_amd64.pet
libdbus-glib-1-2_0.84_amd64.pet
http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic. ... 860#846860
(deps thanks to xanad)
Added to the first post
[url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=76948]Puppy Linux en español[/url]
LibreOffice 5.0.3
Now available LibreOffice 5.0.3 SFS English & Spanish (more languages installing the langpack pets). It was manually created from the packages of libreoffice.org/download. To get a smaller package size (158 MB):
- it was xz-compressed with PackIt 1.9,
- scalable set of gnome and hicolor icons was removed.
Also:
- content of /usr/local was moved to /usr/share,
- .desktop files were edited to remove variable %U not used by Puppy, and to add menu categories used by Puppy.
- it was xz-compressed with PackIt 1.9,
- scalable set of gnome and hicolor icons was removed.
Also:
- content of /usr/local was moved to /usr/share,
- .desktop files were edited to remove variable %U not used by Puppy, and to add menu categories used by Puppy.
[url=http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=76948]Puppy Linux en español[/url]
- Puppus Dogfellow
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Tue 08 Jan 2013, 01:39
- Location: nyc
thing seems to be getting more tolerant of user idiocy. i installed, built, downloaded, etc 5.0.3 while 5.0.2 was still open--no problems. used one, closed it, opened it again, update went off without a hitch. (earlier version would abort the process once the running instance was detected).
anyway, a bounty of 503's:
LibreOffice-5.0.3_en-US_xz.sfs
LibreOffice-5.0.3_en-US_xz.pet
LibreOffice-5.0.3_64_en-US_xz.pet
LibreOffice-5.0.3_64_en-US_xz.sfs
anyway, a bounty of 503's:
LibreOffice-5.0.3_en-US_xz.sfs
LibreOffice-5.0.3_en-US_xz.pet
LibreOffice-5.0.3_64_en-US_xz.pet
LibreOffice-5.0.3_64_en-US_xz.sfs
Has this problem been experienced by anyone else when attempting to install LibreOffice to one of the latest distros?
Wrong link I think....link deletedgcmartin wrote:Has this problem been experienced by anyone else when attempting to install LibreOffice to one of the latest distros?
Problem reported by GCM is that the pet has been renamed without rebuilding the pet - the new PPM rejects such "malformed" pets (there may be a config option to switch this off).
@GCM - rename the pet back to the internal name....
LxPup = Puppy + LXDE
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
Main version used daily: LxPupSc; Assembler of UPups, ScPup & ScPup64, LxPup, LxPupSc & LxPupSc64
- Puppus Dogfellow
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Tue 08 Jan 2013, 01:39
- Location: nyc
what distro is having a problem with the libre packages? they install fine in ppm2 from what i've seen (unicorn pup and added as a pet to various flavors of precise from 5.5. to 572). if the issue (which is unstated and directs you to a removed post for further clarification, but i'll hazard a guess based on the earlier references to package size) is that after using parchive or packit (etc) to recompress the pet (or iso or sfs) to a smaller size things aren't working, it may be because the recompressed directory often has .extracted.xx or something similar added to its name. not renaming things back correctly could mess things up--is this the issue? you could check out 01micko's and rerwin's script to see if there's an error when it's made into an sfs--those also always work for me with no problem though. the next step is the to-pet conversion. here's the script by TheAsterisk! that i use to convert the sfs packages to pet:slavvo67 wrote:I think this is specific to PPM2. I unpackage, rename to what PPM expects (the proper name inside the .peg), and repackage to get around it.
To clarify further, it shouldn't be specific to Libre. PPM2 was designed this way by Mav.
Code: Select all
#!/bin/sh
# Last edited 2012.10.01 by Michael Parker/TheAsterisk!
sfs="$@"
ext=${sfs##*.}
rootname=`basename "$sfs" ".$ext"`
unsquashfs "$@"
mv squashfs-root "$rootname"
dir2tgz "$rootname"
tgz2pet "$rootname".tar.gz
# May choose to use the following two lines in place of the previous two lines
# Comment and uncomment lines accordingly
#dir2pet "$rootname"
#rm nohup.out
rm -rf "$rootname"
the emboldened is why i think it's a conversion of the package issue--the pet was made only once on my side--it never had any other name to rename. i'm pretty sure TheAsterisk's script is making the correct petspec files and the like, or at least is calling on other pup scripts that do.peebee wrote:Wrong link I think....link deletedgcmartin wrote:Has this problem been experienced by anyone else when attempting to install LibreOffice to one of the latest distros?
Problem reported by GCM is that the pet has been renamed without rebuilding the pet - the new PPM rejects such "malformed" pets (there may be a config option to switch this off).
@GCM - rename the pet back to the internal name....
Sorry, Puppus. This issue sounded familiar to problems I was having with certain pet packages. It's been probably 6 months or a year, now. If the outer pet is named different from the inner file, PPM2 rejects it.
Sometimes, the auto-download programs package as, let's say "Firefox.pet" while the file inside is firefox.32.0.432 (or whatever).
Anyway, it's an old issue that has, more or less fixed itself over time. Every once in a while, a package will not install for this. I, personally, haven't had any issues with Libre or the packaging (except for the previous 5.?? version I posted a month or so, ago).
Best,
Slavvo67
Sometimes, the auto-download programs package as, let's say "Firefox.pet" while the file inside is firefox.32.0.432 (or whatever).
Anyway, it's an old issue that has, more or less fixed itself over time. Every once in a while, a package will not install for this. I, personally, haven't had any issues with Libre or the packaging (except for the previous 5.?? version I posted a month or so, ago).
Best,
Slavvo67
- Puppus Dogfellow
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Tue 08 Jan 2013, 01:39
- Location: nyc
nothing to be sorry about, slavvo. i've seen that issue with some pets i've come across (maybe three or four), but none of them were LibreOffice pets, which led me to a different guess than the one you made, and to be fair, we still don't know who was closer to naming the issue, assuming the issue in fact exists, which actually doesn't appear to be the case, at least not past issue issue status. anyway, does this mean you haven't yet hacked TheAsterisk!s script to force xz compression? pets decompress on installation just the same, but i guess it'd make it easier on uploading and downloading. not sure how many pups would get locked out because they can't use xz pets though. any idea if this is a legitimate concern? i can recall it being a mentioned as a problem in a thread or two, but those might have been too old to judge by. has this been universally fixed by a pet or patch or something? is it even still an issue?slavvo67 wrote:Sorry, Puppus. This issue sounded familiar to problems I was having with certain pet packages. It's been probably 6 months or a year, now. If the outer pet is named different from the inner file, PPM2 rejects it.
Sometimes, the auto-download programs package as, let's say "Firefox.pet" while the file inside is firefox.32.0.432 (or whatever).
Anyway, it's an old issue that has, more or less fixed itself over time. Every once in a while, a package will not install for this. I, personally, haven't had any issues with Libre or the packaging (except for the previous 5.?? version I posted a month or so, ago).
Best,
Slavvo67
- Puppus Dogfellow
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Tue 08 Jan 2013, 01:39
- Location: nyc