http://www.smokey01.com/jemimah/saluki/ ... -01.tar.gz
and get this error:
Code: Select all
# compile
bash: compile: command not found
#
Code: Select all
# compile
bash: compile: command not found
#
Code: Select all
sh compile
Code: Select all
./compile
greengeek wrote:I just did my usual frugal, copying across the sfs, vmlinuz and initrd.gz but it "boots" into a very weird and unusable (but very pretty) kaleidoscope of cyan / white / speckly lines and smudges all over the screen. Had to use hard power off to clear.
Aaahh. Finally got it to work. The modeset parameter was the one I needed, but it should not be a comma between the nouveau and the modeset, in fact it has to be a fullstop:01micko wrote:try:failing that:Code: Select all
puppy pfix=ram nouveau,noaccel=1
Code: Select all
puppy pfix=ram nouveau,modeset=0
I'll answer that with a screenyHiDeHo wrote:Hi this being a thin version of slacko are there a good set of .sfs applications available that are current maintained. THis would make ThinSlacko really useful. we need to go back to this approach to puppy beint thin, lightweight, needing a small save file and running apps outside the save file.
I love 533t also - I'm using it as my regular daily choice. My remastered version boots to around 220MB (used amount shown when using the 'free' command). With sound, net, firewall, flash and latest firefox running a SneekyLinux YouTube that rises to around 560MB.greengeek wrote:I've just started trialling this in more depth and wondered what the main differences are between thinslacko5.5 and the predecessor thinslacko5.3.3t?
Main reason for asking is that this newer release is 46MB bigger (100MB for the 533t version) yet lacks a browser, geany or Abiword (all of which were in the previous version)
Where did all the extra MB come from?
I think these two thinslacko offerings deserve wider acclaim.
+1I think these two thinslacko offerings deserve wider acclaim.