The only thing is, Fred, I hope you will respect Toni's wish that any future work on DebianDog itself, by anyone, should not include any non-free components (and certainly not on my DD organization github site) since that was indeed clearly his original concept for it. As for the chosen open-source licenses, I know you never meant to omit these from any scripts, but when you have time one day (no hurry from me) I'd be grateful if you could fix that, just so everything is correct in that sense. I feel that should be the end of any conflict.fredx181 wrote: As for the github DD organization repositories (with exception of XenialDog and doglinux-website), I will not add or delete anything (I think most that's there is valuable, also the older versions), I see it as an archive (at least at this point of time), but if any owner or team member has the aspiration to make improvements, new versions or whatever, I'm absolutely fine with that (and, who knows, I might feel inspired to help :) ).
Hopefully this can be called an agreement, and can we all leave the DD conflicts behind forever.
The composition of XenialDog project and doglinux sites, on the other hand, are entirely up to you, of course, within the limits of github site open-source rules. Whether you decide it is better to later move all these to a github site registered by yourself is something you might want to consider, because otherwise, as you said, I also don't know a way for you to create any new repository without asking me to do that for you (which I would do of course).
More generally, I am fine with the existing site continuing to be used by Toni or yourself with repository admin rights, or frozen as a useful archive (which might be better?).
In that regard, should Toni ever want admin rights to any existing DebianDog repository, I trust you understand I would not hesitate to give that.
Yes, it's nice when the sun shines backi.
William