My bad. I installed that package without realizing it.
jamesbond wrote:
This is ideal but difficult to do in reality. If we could, we would have already implemented this as an automated "upgrade" process (like Puppy does) for old savefile. I remember having a discussion internally within the team about this, and the conclusion at that time was: it's too much error prone to be useful. Things may change, but for now, that's what it is.
Why is this difficult? Because it depends on various factors beyond our control: what you install (which may be a package from the repo, a package from contrib repo, your own "./configure && make && make install", also depends on what sort of data you keep, how you keep it ... and it also depends on things that we do control but difficult (or very tedious) to keep track - library versions, updated configuration files, updated scripts.
I appreciate the work, and the thought, of all of the above. I was thinking about personal, non-system data. I can generally figure things out, but if I don't have to reinvent the wheel, I am happy to copy someone else's wheel. FWIW, I guess that most users, new or otherwise, will not see this forum, or will only see it after a significant time using Fatdog64, and trying to accomplish whatever they want. Adding to the help files from the large store of knowledge contained here will help those new users, growing the user base, and perhaps leading to more pressure from more users like me who want so much, because Fatdog64 already does so much.
Happy Christmas all!