Slacko(32/64) 6.3.2/6.3.0 bug reports.
- Puppus Dogfellow
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Tue 08 Jan 2013, 01:39
- Location: nyc
ppm in slacko 64 says there's no space left on device. there is in excess of 200 gigs.
having problems with the sda2 partition, so this may not be OS related, but two of five installations displayed crazy swap usage (8gb doing routine install things), and two (one of which may have been a crazy swapper--went through five slackos, a precise, and an april all while breaking my own stuff , so not sure. it was all very distracting...) used up their 12 gig first run save-space allotment. one of those installations took (on it now), though i lost the dropbox it synced.
a gripe, not a bug:
what's the easiest way to regain the control the new jwm configuration scripts have taken away? other than the mouse two button, i'd like to be able to get rid of them and all their interference with my configuration choices, reverting to an earlier jwm (how to?--ditching jwmconfig trashed an installation--it wouldn't reboot.) if need be. seems like it should be a user choice to override the developers' choices, especially where there's no harm to be found.
a request, not a gripe:
anyone know of a working megasync package for it? i tried two debs and slackware64 package. i'd try another search of the ppm, but it says it's running, so it's going to exit now, which'd make it just as unavailable (if it's running, it's also well hidden).
any tips for dual monitor support? i got lxrandr to partially work (it will allow you to change the settings, ask if you want to keep them, then ignore your input).
resetting jwm configurations through the gui appears to have broken radky's pup clock set (worked before a switch, then wouldn't even after the switch back).
i recall most slackos and precises as defaulting to a pop up giving you the choice to install when a txz is clicked--is this missing or have i broken something (it worked earlier...but was that in an april or precise...). anyway, i can't get txz packages to install without first unpacking them and then converting them to pet (using don570's newest right click utility, which isn't labeled as 64 bit--the april64 version didn't install correctly).
thanks in advance.
____
played around some more with the jwm configuration gui(s) and found that it undoes many changes for no reason and could use a few additions once things get ironed out: edit labels ("applications," "menu," and "bookmarks" all waste space in my eyes), add your own menu buttons (not just the two), actually allow you to move around the dock, pager, and tasklist (strategy seems to be offer and recommend against a non-option?), pick the starting spot for the trays--some aspects of the new thing are really nice and some don't work well and some don't appear to work at all.
---
on the positive side, this is the first 64 bit pup i've used in which xdotool works correctly (2._ .rpm--slackware and ppm (it was working for me at the time) versions didn't work. need to double check, but i think the redhat version is the one i used (xdotool 2.20110530.1 x86_64 rpm).
having problems with the sda2 partition, so this may not be OS related, but two of five installations displayed crazy swap usage (8gb doing routine install things), and two (one of which may have been a crazy swapper--went through five slackos, a precise, and an april all while breaking my own stuff , so not sure. it was all very distracting...) used up their 12 gig first run save-space allotment. one of those installations took (on it now), though i lost the dropbox it synced.
a gripe, not a bug:
what's the easiest way to regain the control the new jwm configuration scripts have taken away? other than the mouse two button, i'd like to be able to get rid of them and all their interference with my configuration choices, reverting to an earlier jwm (how to?--ditching jwmconfig trashed an installation--it wouldn't reboot.) if need be. seems like it should be a user choice to override the developers' choices, especially where there's no harm to be found.
a request, not a gripe:
anyone know of a working megasync package for it? i tried two debs and slackware64 package. i'd try another search of the ppm, but it says it's running, so it's going to exit now, which'd make it just as unavailable (if it's running, it's also well hidden).
any tips for dual monitor support? i got lxrandr to partially work (it will allow you to change the settings, ask if you want to keep them, then ignore your input).
resetting jwm configurations through the gui appears to have broken radky's pup clock set (worked before a switch, then wouldn't even after the switch back).
i recall most slackos and precises as defaulting to a pop up giving you the choice to install when a txz is clicked--is this missing or have i broken something (it worked earlier...but was that in an april or precise...). anyway, i can't get txz packages to install without first unpacking them and then converting them to pet (using don570's newest right click utility, which isn't labeled as 64 bit--the april64 version didn't install correctly).
thanks in advance.
____
played around some more with the jwm configuration gui(s) and found that it undoes many changes for no reason and could use a few additions once things get ironed out: edit labels ("applications," "menu," and "bookmarks" all waste space in my eyes), add your own menu buttons (not just the two), actually allow you to move around the dock, pager, and tasklist (strategy seems to be offer and recommend against a non-option?), pick the starting spot for the trays--some aspects of the new thing are really nice and some don't work well and some don't appear to work at all.
---
on the positive side, this is the first 64 bit pup i've used in which xdotool works correctly (2._ .rpm--slackware and ppm (it was working for me at the time) versions didn't work. need to double check, but i think the redhat version is the one i used (xdotool 2.20110530.1 x86_64 rpm).
Cannot find cookie settings in stock FF ESR 38.4.0. I am actually wanting to add some exceptions for cookies. Should be under Privacy heading in Preferences, but it's not.
How to fix YouTube Comments in FireFox
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efmWcfarb3M
How to fix YouTube Comments in FireFox
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efmWcfarb3M
Privacy >> History >> Custom Settings.
Wanna mod YouDoob?
https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/by-site/youtube.com
http://userscripts-mirror.org/
Wanna mod YouDoob?
https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/by-site/youtube.com
http://userscripts-mirror.org/
Firefox is choking big time. All YouTube videos now give error
In most cases, I recently played the problematic video and it played fine. I guess it's time to start using Chrome.
Mozilla support:
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1048378
EDIT: It took about 3 hours, but I got Chrome to do most of what Firefox does. Not real happy with Chrome's UI (2 or 3 clicks to get to Bookmarks), but it's a lot better than Opera!!!!
EDIT 2: Chrome causes my computer to freeze. Or at least, what I was doing in Firefox causes Chrome to freeze, and require a hard reset. I thought the computer was overheating, but it's not. Chrome can't do multi-tasking. I was playing a mp4 video, a movie. When I simultaneously browsed with Chrome, the video froze, inoperably. Only way to recover was to hold the front panel power button down, and go through a couple restarts until Slacko recovered. Why did I ever commit to Google Chrome?
Tom's Guide forum: Chrome Freezing Computer
http://www.tomsguide.com/answers/id-239 ... puter.html
One person having the problem fixed it by unchecking hardware acceleration in Settings. [This might have fixed it]
One person fixed it by selecting SATA AHCI in BIOS. [default setting in my BIOS]
SOLVED: Unchecking hardware acceleration in Chrome Settings seems to have fixed the freezing problem. Also, there is no noticeable cumulative sluggishness and lag in Chrome, which is a big improvement over Firefox. If Chrome refuses to download/install your favorite add-on or extension, try installing the adaptive extension Chameleon which allows the addition of Opera add-ons.
Code: Select all
No video with supported format and MIME type found.
Mozilla support:
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1048378
EDIT: It took about 3 hours, but I got Chrome to do most of what Firefox does. Not real happy with Chrome's UI (2 or 3 clicks to get to Bookmarks), but it's a lot better than Opera!!!!
EDIT 2: Chrome causes my computer to freeze. Or at least, what I was doing in Firefox causes Chrome to freeze, and require a hard reset. I thought the computer was overheating, but it's not. Chrome can't do multi-tasking. I was playing a mp4 video, a movie. When I simultaneously browsed with Chrome, the video froze, inoperably. Only way to recover was to hold the front panel power button down, and go through a couple restarts until Slacko recovered. Why did I ever commit to Google Chrome?
Tom's Guide forum: Chrome Freezing Computer
http://www.tomsguide.com/answers/id-239 ... puter.html
One person having the problem fixed it by unchecking hardware acceleration in Settings. [This might have fixed it]
One person fixed it by selecting SATA AHCI in BIOS. [default setting in my BIOS]
SOLVED: Unchecking hardware acceleration in Chrome Settings seems to have fixed the freezing problem. Also, there is no noticeable cumulative sluggishness and lag in Chrome, which is a big improvement over Firefox. If Chrome refuses to download/install your favorite add-on or extension, try installing the adaptive extension Chameleon which allows the addition of Opera add-ons.
I had to restart the computer after a day or so, because Chrome was starting to hang. Rebooting caused Chrome to lose all settings, like bookmarks, extensions, history. And first instance of Chrome after rebooting prompted me to sign in to a Google account. Unless I am mistaken, this means I can't use Chrome without allowing Google to spy on me. Not so?
Obviously, I don't want Chrome to sync anything. I get a check list of 9 items:
Apps, Autofil, Bookmarks, Extensions, History, Passwords, Settings, Themes, Open Tabs. What does Chrome want to sync these to? Is syncing the way that Chrome can restore all the windows and tabs that were running at the time of a reboot?
Obviously, I don't want Chrome to sync anything. I get a check list of 9 items:
Apps, Autofil, Bookmarks, Extensions, History, Passwords, Settings, Themes, Open Tabs. What does Chrome want to sync these to? Is syncing the way that Chrome can restore all the windows and tabs that were running at the time of a reboot?
Typically "syncing" in browser-speak means saving your bookmarks etc to thenubc wrote:Is syncing the way that Chrome can restore all the windows and tabs that were running at the time of a reboot?
cloud, so that if you run Chrome on another computer or other
Internet-connected device, you can have the same settings.
That's the way it is in Firefox and I'm pretty sure that's how Chrome uses the term.
I notice you don't reply much these days Nubc. A quick thank you is free & costs very little time..
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=102262
Yes, you're welcome.
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=102262
Yes, you're welcome.
>>> Living with the immediacy of death helps you sort out your priorities. It helps you live a life less trivial <<<
I spent two days troubleshooting Chrome, with no help, and I shared my findings here. You don't think that's a contribution? The question above (about syncing) was asking for a clarification, for which I am appreciative. Had that question involved a procedure, I probably would have thanked the responder, 6502coder. If this were my thread, I would also be more communicative, but this is an important community thread for bug reports and I don't want to clog it with unnecessary posts. The thread is already 12 pages long.
As regards the menu widget, it would be useful to know the exact name of the widget. When dev tacks a piece of bling like that onto the OS, he should provide a easy way to disable it, so that user doesn't have to come here to beg for the fix. Without the (arbitrary) name of the widget, what can you do? Does this query remind you of Puppy 4.2?
As always, thanks for your response, Semme.
SOLVED: I renamed the jwmrc-tray2 file in /root/.jwm/ then created an empty file by the name jwmrc-tray2 to replace it.
As regards the menu widget, it would be useful to know the exact name of the widget. When dev tacks a piece of bling like that onto the OS, he should provide a easy way to disable it, so that user doesn't have to come here to beg for the fix. Without the (arbitrary) name of the widget, what can you do? Does this query remind you of Puppy 4.2?
As always, thanks for your response, Semme.
SOLVED: I renamed the jwmrc-tray2 file in /root/.jwm/ then created an empty file by the name jwmrc-tray2 to replace it.
Last edited by nubc on Mon 01 Feb 2016, 19:10, edited 2 times in total.
Can't connect to internet with cable after running firewall
Can't connect to internet with cable after running firewall wizard
Today I did a pfix=ram boot from the cd and I can get on the internet.The issues start after I run the firewall wizard.
To connect with the internet, I have to use http://www.slackware.com/~alien/efg/]Al ... r IPTables . If I reboot after that, then I won't be able to connect with the net. The firewall itself does not allow connection to the internet.
The details are; Interface: eth0, Type: wired, Driver: forcedeth, Bus: PCI. It works ok with Precise 5.7.1 and any other Puppy I have tried
Let's see if the text in this post will show
Today I did a pfix=ram boot from the cd and I can get on the internet.The issues start after I run the firewall wizard.
To connect with the internet, I have to use http://www.slackware.com/~alien/efg/]Al ... r IPTables . If I reboot after that, then I won't be able to connect with the net. The firewall itself does not allow connection to the internet.
The details are; Interface: eth0, Type: wired, Driver: forcedeth, Bus: PCI. It works ok with Precise 5.7.1 and any other Puppy I have tried
Let's see if the text in this post will show
Last edited by RickGT351 on Mon 01 Feb 2016, 23:56, edited 5 times in total.
Sharing is good Nubc, and you do a better job than most when it comes to feedback.
That 6.3 doesn't jive with my ride limits my input.
My link should have addressed that annoying widget thingy.. As far as I can tell it does nothing more than clutter the desktop. Have a quick launch bar or icons, not both. I also agree there should be more documentation for this kind of included "functionality."
Beyond the slew of changes, I imagine you'd be more content continuing with 5.7 than being a beta tester.
That 6.3 doesn't jive with my ride limits my input.
My link should have addressed that annoying widget thingy.. As far as I can tell it does nothing more than clutter the desktop. Have a quick launch bar or icons, not both. I also agree there should be more documentation for this kind of included "functionality."
Beyond the slew of changes, I imagine you'd be more content continuing with 5.7 than being a beta tester.
>>> Living with the immediacy of death helps you sort out your priorities. It helps you live a life less trivial <<<
Q: Chrome wants to download web images in .webp format, which is a Google thing. I prefer standard .jpg or even .png. Slacko's resident Image Viewer does not recognize .webp (compressed) format. Is Chrome capable of acquiring images in .jpg?
A: Once again, Google is doing something brilliantly stupid.
http://www.ghacks.net/2013/10/15/avoid- ... le-chrome/
SOLVED: I'm not saying it's the best solution, but I installed an extension named "Save Image As Type" which is added to the context menu called when user right clicks an image. Download images optionally as .jpg .png or .webp
A: Once again, Google is doing something brilliantly stupid.
http://www.ghacks.net/2013/10/15/avoid- ... le-chrome/
SOLVED: I'm not saying it's the best solution, but I installed an extension named "Save Image As Type" which is added to the context menu called when user right clicks an image. Download images optionally as .jpg .png or .webp
Last edited by nubc on Thu 04 Feb 2016, 10:36, edited 3 times in total.
Nope, Semme, that doesn't work, just doublechecked, format not recognized.
The Chrome extension "Save Image As Type" has had problems in the past (hence the lower 3-star rating), but it was recently fixed, and it works quite well.
The Chrome extension "Save Image As Type" has had problems in the past (hence the lower 3-star rating), but it was recently fixed, and it works quite well.
Last edited by nubc on Mon 01 Feb 2016, 23:14, edited 1 time in total.
It seems that editing a post in this website doesn't work with this new distro
Correction; it's not the distro, it's the website. Let's see if this works
This is weird. It seems that it doesn't like pasted text
Correction; it's not the distro, it's the website. Let's see if this works
This is weird. It seems that it doesn't like pasted text
Last edited by RickGT351 on Mon 01 Feb 2016, 23:57, edited 2 times in total.
Can't connect to internet with cable after running firewall wizard.
Today I did a pfix=ram boot from the cd and I can get on the internet. The issues start after I run the firewall wizard.
To connect to the internet I have to use http://www.slackware.com/~alien/efg/]Al ... r IPTables . If I reboot after that, then I won't be able to connect with the net. The firewall itself does not allow connection to the internet.
The details are; Interface: eth0, Type: wired, Driver: forcedeth, Bus: PCI. It works ok with Precise 5.7.1 and any other Puppy I have tried
Today I did a pfix=ram boot from the cd and I can get on the internet. The issues start after I run the firewall wizard.
To connect to the internet I have to use http://www.slackware.com/~alien/efg/]Al ... r IPTables . If I reboot after that, then I won't be able to connect with the net. The firewall itself does not allow connection to the internet.
The details are; Interface: eth0, Type: wired, Driver: forcedeth, Bus: PCI. It works ok with Precise 5.7.1 and any other Puppy I have tried
Last edited by RickGT351 on Tue 02 Feb 2016, 00:02, edited 1 time in total.
Can't connect to internet with cable after running firewall wizard
Today I did a pfix=ram boot from the cd and I can get on the internet.The issues start after I run the firewall wizard.
To connect with the internet, I have to use http://www.slackware.com/~alien/efg/]Al ... r IPTables . If I reboot after that, then I won't be able to connect with the net. The firewall itself does not allow connection to the internet.
The details are; Interface: eth0, Type: wired, Driver: forcedeth, Bus: PCI. It works ok with Precise 5.7.1 and any other Puppy I have tried
Today I did a pfix=ram boot from the cd and I can get on the internet.The issues start after I run the firewall wizard.
To connect with the internet, I have to use http://www.slackware.com/~alien/efg/]Al ... r IPTables . If I reboot after that, then I won't be able to connect with the net. The firewall itself does not allow connection to the internet.
The details are; Interface: eth0, Type: wired, Driver: forcedeth, Bus: PCI. It works ok with Precise 5.7.1 and any other Puppy I have tried