(old)Puppy Linux Discussion Forum

to be clear, do you mean the hplip_print PET from here or the hplite package from another section?

http://www.mediafire.com/download/hk4um ... 3.16.5.pet

Those pets are installed in my system

First of all, sane-find-scanner is broken in Tahrpup 605. Is that why you installed SANE v1.0.26?

But hplip_scan v3.16.5 is definitely working with my HP models.

Because you have now made a number of changes, it's impossible to know what's going on. I would recommend a fresh install of Tahpup that reverts to the original SANE.

Then install the hplip_scan PET and check with scanimage -L.

If you want a working sane-find-scanner, pull it out of a Slacko.

rcrsn51 wrote:First of all, sane-find-scanner is broken in Tahrpup 605. Is that why you installed SANE v1.0.26?

But hplip_scan v3.16.5 is definitely working with my HP models.

Because you have now made a number of changes, it's impossible to know what's going on. I would recommend a fresh install of Tahpup that reverts to the original SANE.

Then install the hplip_scan PET and check with scanimage -L.

If you want a working sane-find-scanner, pull it out of a Slacko.

Thanks I Will Try it and report back.

Your Officejet 6200s looks like a standard model and the scanner should work. Have you tried it with other Linuxes?

It worked. My packages broke the sane backend. At the beginning I tried sane-find-scanner and did not detect anything so then I decided to compile a newer version, everything spiraled downward from there. I did not try to get the hp drivers until I had already tried to use the newer version of sane
https://postimg.org/image/6s19kivif

as title says - the links appear to be broken from mediafire... the link i was specifically interested in is/was the tahrpup64 combo hplip printer/scanner...

if there is going to be an update anyways - is there any way to get the latest/greatest version ? ie - i think it is the 3.16-series rather than the 3.15 series now... otoh, my printer/scanner is fairly old and so it does not need the latest/greatest to work, i assume (hp officejet 4500 g-z somesuch)...

tia, h.

Appear nothing. They ARE.

Hmm.. Bill's last post?

Unless someone provides a pkg via PM or link, you're SOL Mate!

@rcrsn51

Wanted to try your hplip_print-3.16.5.pet and hplip_san-3.16.5.pet for the new 64-bit Slacko but your site hasn't been working for a week now? I guess you know by now the new 64-bit has a print problem, hopefully your .pet's will correct things?

>>>---Indian------>

I' very worried because I buyed HP LaserJet Pro MFP M127fs and I cannot print with Puppy slacko...
CUPS 1.4.8 worked fine with other printer Lexmark
Now I have :
HP LaserJet Pro MFP m127fs, hpcups 3.16.8, requires proprietary plugin
in Location Make and Model column
and when I try to print I can read in State column:
processing since
mar 27 set 2016 11:21:13 CEST
"/usr/lib/cups/filter/hpcups failed"

Please help me !!!

Now I tryed extracting PPD file to HPLIP

HP LaserJet Pro MFP m127fs hpijs, 3.16.8, requires proprietary plugin (color, 2-sided printing)

but when I try I have

processing since
mar 27 set 2016 11:32:38 CEST
"Connected to printer..."

and after half minute disappear and I have No Jobs

Same if I connect with USB. In CUPS I found printer but doesn't works

I'm about to start using the HP laserjet Pro 200 Colour MFP, I have HPlip and HP scan installed for my HP Deskjet F2480, its been working well for a couple of years now. Do I need to install foo2xxx_rcrsn.pet to get the Pro 200 working. My distro is Slacko 5.9.3.

I'm bumping my post as I've not had a reply. Any body?

I'm not able to download hplip as mentioned in this post ( deleted ? not undertsanding ?)

The latest hplip_print-3.16.5.pet can be downloaded here. Click the small green DOWNLOAD box.
Code:
847da256f12b575596529eaae4b1bad4 hplip_print-3.16.5.pet

The hplip_scan-3.16.5.pet is here. Click the small green DOWNLOAD box.
Code:
fac1185b4a6efae3000a617bcbefe33a hplip_scan-3.16.5.pet

please precise or give me a other link

Hello Rcrsn51,

Update: I have built a 64bit version of HPLIP specifically for Tahrpup64. This is a combo print/scan package . Download it here.
Code:
e0936e8883891fe0f2acf1cd67c95ff0 hplip_print_scan_tahr64-3.15.9.pet

Mediafire says file not there. Is there an alternative site to find this .pet?

Thank you for your response in advance.

Sky

rcrsn51 has been mia for a few months, hope he returns.

Pet here, same md5 checksum.

http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... 95f2180190

Thank you, perdido,

Is the download website secure? Seamonkey is giving me warnings that it isn't.

Your Welcome Sky Aisling.

Pale Moon complained but I granted it a security exception. The download checked out ok.

Self signed security certificate https://www.sslshopper.com/article-when ... table.html

This will help keep the file alive, can also get it here
http://www.ibm-pc.org/puppy/hplip_print ... 3.15.9.pet
md5 checksum e0936e8883891fe0f2acf1cd67c95ff0

.

.

perdido wrote:rcrsn51 has been mia for a few months, hope he returns.

As do I. One of the community's most valuable members! I hope he is alive and doing well.

Bob

Hello,
I'm having no joy attempting to make hplip_print_scan_tahr64-3.15.9.pet to work on two of my machines. One machine is a 32bit machine the other is a 64 bit machine. I am running the same Tahrpup on both machines, one via CD, one via HDD.
To my surprise when I run a startup check to see which version of Tahrpup I am running the check tells me that I am running a 32bit Tahrpup NOT a 64bit Tahrpup.
Will this make a difference in the hplip_print_scan_tahr64-3.15.9.pet running?
Thank you for your reply in advance.

Hi, all.

I'm actually getting a wee bit concerned about Bill.

Every single link to stuff he's put together is coming up with 'Invalid or missing/deleted file'. To me, this points to one of two things:-

Either he's no longer with us (period). Or,
He's given up on Puppy.

You tend to get this from file-sharing sites when stuff hasn't been accessed for, say, 6 months or more. But with the number of Puppians accessing these links, that wouldn't happen.

So that leads me to the unhappy conclusion that he's finally given up on Puppy.....and has deleted everything himself...(???)

Don't know what to think. 'Course, I could be completely wrong; I don't know what happens with file-sharing accounts if the account holder doesn't access them for several months (even though other people do)...

I do hope he's okay.


Mike.