Page 3 of 3
Posted: Sat 25 Jun 2011, 14:37
by sc0ttman
Iguleder wrote:Theoretically, yes - but it's a very bad idea, for two reasons:
1) You can't install a kernel in Puppy, you'll have to remaster or rebuild your Puppy for that.
2) The kernel is a very sensitive component - it deserves its own build system.
I thought it would be wrong to put it in there, as its not installable in the same way as the pther packages, just wondered.
Posted: Fri 19 Aug 2011, 06:55
by Lothar
Hey Iguleder and Pemasu,
I emailed J R Okajima (the man behind Aufs) in regard to the aufs-allow-sfs patch, and he wanted me to ask:
"Would you try aufs without the aufs-allow-sfs patch? I think it should work since July last year."
Posted: Fri 19 Aug 2011, 11:15
by Iguleder
If it works, don't touch it
All Puppy's kernels are built with this patch and work just fine, and I don't want to do all the testing that follows its removal. It causes zero issues, so I see no problem with using it.