Hello To every one..
I can mount squashsfs file sytem.. ..after mounting i cant able to write.. its in read only mode....but i copied into root... it shows error message...
So my objective.. i want to edit pup_300.sfs (script).. how to copy these file sytem ..and also to make squash file system.. how to do..?
Give a best solution for this.. [/b]
How to mount squashfs?
Hi Bruce,
yes, I've seen you post elsewhere, wondering why people continue to use the first. My reasons are, a) it usually works & b) I'm terminally lazy, less keystrokes. (pun intended here!).
Oddly, I did have an episode where it stopped working for some reason then, probably after several reboots, decided to work again! I'm pretty sure that when it wasn't working, I tried -t squashfs, using mount-FULL etc, all to no avail. The only conclusion that I can draw is that I must have installed something that corrupted some system/library file. I should have been more meticulous in noting how I got it working again.
yes, I've seen you post elsewhere, wondering why people continue to use the first. My reasons are, a) it usually works & b) I'm terminally lazy, less keystrokes. (pun intended here!).
Oddly, I did have an episode where it stopped working for some reason then, probably after several reboots, decided to work again! I'm pretty sure that when it wasn't working, I tried -t squashfs, using mount-FULL etc, all to no avail. The only conclusion that I can draw is that I must have installed something that corrupted some system/library file. I should have been more meticulous in noting how I got it working again.
Muggins,
That's why I said - your mileage may differ (vary).
Versions may vary.
I suppose you've noticed that 'mount' is getting pretty smart about recognizing file system types and the -t argument often not required.
What some may or may not have noticed is Puppy's mount command in 2.17 (at least) is actually a BK script and not the mount command at all. It works great, but I like to know what I'm running and in the case of running mount, I'm running one of Barry's scripts.
If I want to actually run the mount command itself, I'd have to type in mount-FULL
Bruce
That's why I said - your mileage may differ (vary).
Versions may vary.
I suppose you've noticed that 'mount' is getting pretty smart about recognizing file system types and the -t argument often not required.
What some may or may not have noticed is Puppy's mount command in 2.17 (at least) is actually a BK script and not the mount command at all. It works great, but I like to know what I'm running and in the case of running mount, I'm running one of Barry's scripts.
If I want to actually run the mount command itself, I'd have to type in mount-FULL
Bruce