Why Unmoderated Online Forums Always Degenerate Into Fascism

For stuff that really doesn't have ANYTHING to do with Puppy
Message
Author
User avatar
Colonel Panic
Posts: 2171
Joined: Sat 16 Sep 2006, 11:09

#21 Post by Colonel Panic »

I think the main reason's fairly simple; unmoderated forums by definition don't deny access to anyone, and so they're inevitably going to attract people who are denied access everywhere else. Since proponents of far right views are generally discouraged on mainstream forums, they're the ones who will be drawn to unmoderated ones.
Gigabyte M68MT-52P motherboard, AMD Athlon II X4 630, 5.8 GB of DDR3 RAM and a 250 GB Hitachi hard drive running Ubuntu 16.04.6, MX-19.2, Peppermint 10, PCLinuxOS 20.02, LXLE 18.04.3, Pardus 19.2, exGENT 200119, Bionic Pup 8.0 and Xenial CE 7.5 XL.

s243a
Posts: 2580
Joined: Tue 02 Sep 2014, 04:48
Contact:

#22 Post by s243a »

Colonel Panic wrote:I think the main reason's fairly simple; unmoderated forums by definition don't deny access to anyone, and so they're inevitably going to attract people who are denied access everywhere else. Since proponents of far right views are generally discouraged on mainstream forums, they're the ones who will be drawn to unmoderated ones.
It just isn't people on the "far right" that are being censored from mainstream platforms. Many major non-establishment leftwing entities (people/groups/news comapines etc..) have been removed from twitter or demonetized on youtube. The narrative that it is only far right wing accounts that are being penalized is the propaganda that is causing people to give their tacit consent to giving up their free speech rights on the modern public square (AKA social media).

The truth is that twitter doesn't care about civility. The blue check mark twitter elite is free to fabricate social justice controversy after social justice controversy in the name of progress. They can call for the doxing of children or even possibly violence against children in the the name of social justice (and tolerance???).

What twitter and other social media companies want is the ability to censor speech while retaining the liability protections that comes with being a "common carrier of information". The rhetoric of "fighting NAZI's is a distraction.
Find me on [url=https://www.minds.com/ns_tidder]minds[/url] and on [url=https://www.pearltrees.com/s243a/puppy-linux/id12399810]pearltrees[/url].

User avatar
nosystemdthanks
Posts: 703
Joined: Thu 03 May 2018, 16:13
Contact:

#23 Post by nosystemdthanks »

Colonel Panic wrote:I think the main reason's fairly simple; unmoderated forums by definition don't deny access to anyone, and so they're inevitably going to attract people who are denied access everywhere else. Since proponents of far right views are generally discouraged on mainstream forums, they're the ones who will be drawn to unmoderated ones.
ahh logic, even in the 21st century!
[color=green]The freedom to NOT run the software, to be free to avoid vendor lock-in through appropriate modularization/encapsulation and minimized dependencies; meaning any free software can be replaced with a user’s preferred alternatives.[/color]

User avatar
Flash
Official Dog Handler
Posts: 13071
Joined: Wed 04 May 2005, 16:04
Location: Arizona USA

#24 Post by Flash »

The Lonely Work of Moderating Hacker News
A very interesting article from the New Yorker that seems germane to this thread. Much too long to be summarized here.

User avatar
nosystemdthanks
Posts: 703
Joined: Thu 03 May 2018, 16:13
Contact:

#25 Post by nosystemdthanks »

Flash wrote:The Lonely Work of Moderating Hacker News
A very interesting article from the New Yorker that seems germane to this thread. Much too long to be summarized here.
moderation isnt a fun job, thats for sure.
[color=green]The freedom to NOT run the software, to be free to avoid vendor lock-in through appropriate modularization/encapsulation and minimized dependencies; meaning any free software can be replaced with a user’s preferred alternatives.[/color]

User avatar
Colonel Panic
Posts: 2171
Joined: Sat 16 Sep 2006, 11:09

#26 Post by Colonel Panic »

nosystemdthanks wrote:
Flash wrote:The Lonely Work of Moderating Hacker News
A very interesting article from the New Yorker that seems germane to this thread. Much too long to be summarized here.
moderation isnt a fun job, thats for sure.
I know. I used to run my old school's alumni forum whilst the guy who set it up was recovering from an eye operation and at one point there was a cricket match going on (I won't say which one) which one team lost very narrowly. A couple of guys on the forum entertained the suggestion that the team lost because one of the team's players deliberately threw the match. I had to tell them (politely) to knock it off because we could have been sued.
Gigabyte M68MT-52P motherboard, AMD Athlon II X4 630, 5.8 GB of DDR3 RAM and a 250 GB Hitachi hard drive running Ubuntu 16.04.6, MX-19.2, Peppermint 10, PCLinuxOS 20.02, LXLE 18.04.3, Pardus 19.2, exGENT 200119, Bionic Pup 8.0 and Xenial CE 7.5 XL.

User avatar
greengeek
Posts: 5789
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2010, 09:34
Location: Republic of Novo Zelande

#27 Post by greengeek »

Funnily enough both far right and far left viewpoints always seem to result in violent fascist acts.

So in my view, left and right extremes are more circular than polar. One leads directly to the other in a continuum. The extreme viewpoints are all about acquiring power. Maybe that is at the heart of narcissism.

And surely there are more than just two perspectives. Many many shades of grey.

Post Reply