You just missed a (very) used one for $71.50 on ebayAitch wrote: Nice job.....makes me want an XO to try.....
Aitch
But do not despair You can easily play with one for some time in your neck of the woods
You just missed a (very) used one for $71.50 on ebayAitch wrote: Nice job.....makes me want an XO to try.....
Aitch
It looks like it.Aitch wrote: ilovemyxo.com seems to be dead....?
This one? or this?I saw an instructable on how to install a supermini usb k/b into an XO.....but the specified k/b isn't available anymore....so I wondered about a bit of surgery with one of these....?
eBay Is your only option.sullysat wrote:
Does anyone know a good source for the XO laptop? I really want to get one of these for my grandson.
Thanks,
Sully
rrolsbe wrote:Since the OLPC booting Puppy Linux uses half of the available SDRAM for the /tmp RAM file system, I was wondering what performance would be like if /tmp was reduced and a zram compressed swap were used in the freed up ram? Since the OLPC only has 256Mb of RAM, is it necessary to use half of the RAM for /tmp (pros/cons)? The xopup-XXX.sfs file is being loaded into RAM when Puppy boots on the OLPC, correct?
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Zram_disks
Anyone tried this or something similar?
Regards, Ron
Since the OLPC booting Puppy Linux uses half of the available SDRAM for the /tmp RAM file system, I was wondering what performance would be like if /tmp was reduced and a zram compressed swap were used in the freed up ram? Since the OLPC only has 256Mb of RAM, is it necessary to use half of the RAM for /tmp (pros/cons)? The xopup-XXX.sfs file is being loaded into RAM when Puppy boots on the OLPC, correct?
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Zram_disks
Anyone tried this or something similar?
Regards, Ron
rrolsbe wrote:Since the OLPC booting Puppy Linux uses half of the available SDRAM for the /tmp RAM file system, I was wondering what performance would be like if /tmp was reduced and a zram compressed swap were used in the freed up ram? Since the OLPC only has 256Mb of RAM, is it necessary to use half of the RAM for /tmp (pros/cons)? The xopup-XXX.sfs file is being loaded into RAM when Puppy boots on the OLPC, correct?
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Zram_disks
Anyone tried this or something similar?
Regards, Ron
Hi Ron,rrolsbe wrote:Since the OLPC booting Puppy Linux uses half of the available SDRAM for the /tmp RAM file system, I was wondering what performance would be like if /tmp was reduced and a zram compressed swap were used in the freed up ram? Since the OLPC only has 256Mb of RAM, is it necessary to use half of the RAM for /tmp (pros/cons)? The xopup-XXX.sfs file is being loaded into RAM when Puppy boots on the OLPC, correct?
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Zram_disks
Anyone tried this or something similar?
Regards, Ron
Code: Select all
" console=ttyS0,115200 console=tty0 fbcon=font:SUN12x22 ${PD} pfix=nocopy" expand$ to boot-file
ThanksJames C wrote:Fixed the url so post would show.