I agree images should be resized with a image editor for 2 reasons, one it keeps them square in reduction, Which makes them more clearer and the second reason is a smaller file size that returns in quicker page views and lower monthly bandwidth.abushcrafter wrote:arrrrrr! .Lobster wrote:Have made a few modifications and uploaded here
http://tmxxine.com/luci/
You resized the images using the width and hight parameters not by resizing the images in a image editor! I told you not to do that!
You used a table for formatting! This I forgot to mention. I scribe to not using tables for formatting. Only for displaying data. Use CSS for formatting and in this case a "class" parameter/properties (I need to decide or find out on what to call them) in a "div" tag.
You also got rid of the validation images and links. I proudly put those on. To show I had go to the effort of making it standard compliment.
css vs tables, well this is kind of one of those things, some small puppy browsers don't use css, so those people would have an awful web page to look at, also tables are quick and easy, I don't really see any reason why not to use tables.
validation images and links these are always nice to see like http://www.w3schools.com/site/site_validate.asp
or even html editor's
http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/
or wysiwyg editors
http://kompozer.net/
ttuuxxx